Some things never change

http://pamelageller.com/2015/09/us-irans-no-1-enemy-despite-nuclear-deal-cleric.html/

Well I told you so. Never trust the Iranian government and the clerics for that matter. The fact that America is still public enemy number 1 according to Iran doesn't surprise me at all. The Iranians are playing us and the west like a game of chess. The countdown of the Iranians attacking the United States and Israel is clearly underway.

This story has been released as I am beginning to write my latest novel Fallout which is about the Iran Deal that is set in the near future. In Fallout the Iran Deal proves to become a disastrous one as CIA Agent J.T. Vincent races against time to prevent terrorist attacks by Iran in the United States and Israel. Meanwhile a rogue team of CIA agents tries to ferment a war between the Saudis, Iran, ISIS and the Moslem Brotherhood while the aforementioned elements have operatives influencing the various members of the Executive Branch of the United States government competing to see who would be the first to take the US down from within.

Could this be a guise in more ways then one?

15,000 more refugees to be resettled in U.S. next year http://wapo.st/1LGwXGv

Now the numbers in the Syrian refugees have changed yet again. It looks like 85,000 Syrian refugees will be settling in the United States in 2016. Secretary of State John Kerry has argued that the United States' tradition of immigration is about second chances and a beacon of hope for those who desire a better life. Now what concerns me is the interpretation of this. Could it be for those who truly desire freedom and a better life than the one that was experienced in Syria or could it be ISIS and the other proponents of Radical Islam who see this as an opportunity to expand their own version of second chances and being a beacon of hope when it comes to furthering the agenda of spreading their own brand of Islam throughout the world. This alone concerns me deeply.

Also the other question that I wonder is how far has the infiltration seeped its way into the United States government. After readinf books such as Infiltration and Moslem Mafia (key research for my third novel Deception) there has been questions about how far this has actually spread. Could it be that it is worse than any of us realize? Could the allegations that were made about the president being Moslem and convincing John Kerry to use this arguement about being a land of second chances and a beacon of hope as a guise to turn the US into a Moslem nation be in fact true.  Granted there can be convincing arguments for and against any of these points. All I am doing is reporting the facts and the view points of both sides. We are living in perilous times and the last thing America needs is another 9/11ish attack or worse. This sudden influx of Syrian immigrants could very well prove to be the tipping point.

A scene from my third novel" Deception" is being played out in real time

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2015/09/16/syrian-refugees-us-could-exceed-10000-samantha-power/32520855/

Last August I published my third novel "Deception." "Deception" is about a Saudi Arabian plot to take over the US and European nations for the Mecca Caliphate. A story line in "Deception" is about millions of Arabs emigrating to the United States and European nations en masse. Now with the sudden massive influx of Syrian citizens coming to the USA and Europe, the aforementioned scene in "Deception" has now become prophetic.

     The United States is a nation of immigrants. That alone is one reason that made the USA a great nation for years. America has been a beacon for immigrants who came here to escape persecution, make a better life for themselves and their families and to live in a country where freedom is the American Way of Life.  To me I give the USA some serious respect for doing this. My concern is the ISIS, al-Qaeda or other terrorist operatives who may see this as an opportunity to further their agenda by carrying out acts of terrorism or even further infiltrate the US government or law enforcement among national entities in order to bring about their radical vision of bringing down the United States from within by molding our laws to fit their needs, allowing sleepers to occupy key positions in the US government or even their operatives become employed by the various law enforcement and intelligence agencies so they can turn a blind eye to their fellow operatives who will use this opportunity to carry out devastating terrorist attacks. This is one of my concerns going forward when it comes to the future of the USA.

Tom

Iranian Hubris or Lack Thereof...

http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Iran/Iranian-military-official-We-laugh-when-US-threatens-to-attack-411923

After reading the article in the above link, all I can say is "How stupid were we to make a deal with them?" The Iranian military official talks about how he laughs when the US threatens to attack Iran and how they made us bow before them.  This is obviously part of the sick and twisted plan by Iran to have us make the deal with them, then humiliate us by making us bow before the thug nation and then ultimately attack us and Israel after developing their nukes if they haven't done so by now in their five or much more nuclear facilities located throughout the Islamic Republic.

     I know that President Obama is trying to make peace with the Arab world (so he says) in order to soften the US image worldwide, but this is not the way to do it. In fact it only strengthens the case that some of his critics have made that he is essentially anti-American and is plotting to destroy America from within along with the argument that he is Islamic or even an Islamic operative. As much as wasn't a fan of Reagan or both Bushes, they wouldn't have allowed this deal to go as far as it has to this point. Bill Clinton would've never allowed this deal to occur. Former President Clinton would've bombed Iran if he felt that it was necessary. Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush obviously were gutless cowards in that regard. They not only failed to bomb Iran, but only after doing what they should have done first. That was to make an honest and serious effort to rescue the Americans and other Western hostages in Beirut from the mid-1980s to the early 1990's instead of being so lazy about it and letting Terry Anderson, Thomas Sutherland, Terry Waite and the other hostages rot in Beirut instead of being REAL presidents and have the sack to rescue them.

Palestinians and Iran to disarm alleged Israeli nukes

http://www.algemeiner.com/2015/08/11/palestinians-and-iran-agree-to-disarm-israels-alleged-nukes/

All I can say upon reading this article is that this plan is a cover for their master plan to nuke Israel. If Israel has nukes, it would only be for use in situations where Israel must defend itself. Such a scenario in inner circles would be The Samson Option. This would only occur as a last resort when Israel would face nuclear attack from its surrounding Arab neighbors.

Yes I can only envision the Iranian argument that they are using nuclear energy for peaceful means and the the U.S. and Israel have no right to prevent Iran from having nuclear energy. However Iran's true intention is to build a nuclear warhead. They supposedly have at least five such facilities and quite possibly much more and people complain about Israel's alleged nuclear weapons. No wonder Israel has denied that they have nuclear weapons.  Look at whom they are up against. I don't blame the Israelis not only for denying that they have nuclear weapons, but also for having them as well. Israel must have the God given right to defend themselves.  At least that is why they have their alleged nuclear program. Iran desires to have nuclear weapons only to strike the U.S., Israel and Iran's other enemies. Need I say more.

Tom

Paranoia or not...that is the question

Obama on Iran: The Specter of World War III http://flip.it/kL39U

I had to share this.  I have read many scenarios of how World War III would play out through the years. I have news for everyone World War III began on September 11, 2001. However this is not the World War III as we would know it to be nor was World War I or World War II for that matter. Presently I am working on a non-fiction historical book tentatively titled "World War I: The War That Never Ended." To give everyone a brief sneak preview, World War has played out in three stages over the past century. World War I in my first foray into non-fiction will be explained as World War: The First Series of Battles. World War II will be explained as World War: The Second Series of Battles. World War III will be explained as World War: The Third Series of Battles. I know that this will be looked upon as a very unconventional look (and I say this very mildly I might add) and will take some time, but read the book when it is finished and published and you will have a better understanding of it.

That said back to the article on Flipboard. The case that President Obama made for allowing the Iran Deal to pass through Congress can be best described as intimidating the House and the Senate along with the American people.  The scenarios that he presented should the deal be votes down in Congress are left field arguements. Russia and China would go to war with each other should the deal be voted down as the article mentioned. What would this war have to do with Congress vetoing any such deal? There would be no such war. The president argued that such a veto would make the world look upon the US as a laughingstock (Those were not President Obama's exact word. I was just paraphrasing). I could go on about this but all I can say is that I hope the president's support for the Iran Deal will not ultimately result in an actual war with Iran. However I am concerned that it's not if such a war would take place but only when such a war will occur...

August 2001 revisited? Could history repeat itself once more?

Al Qaeda branch: Attack U.S. http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/04/middleeast/al-qaeda-branch-yemen-united-states/index.html

al-Qaeda has urged its followers to attack the United States. In August 2001 it urged its followers to do so. Hence the CIA memo Bin Laden Determined to Strike the United States. Need I remind anyone what took place a month later?

Fast forward to August 2015. This time an al-Qaeda branch in Yemen has issued a similar order. A pattern seems to be now forming. Does anyone remember the saying history repeats itself over and over again? As a lifelong student of history especially American History as well as Middle Eastern History, I have been reminded of that very saying on many occasions.  Then twenty years ago this month, I remember Dr. Fabiano teaching me and the rest of my U.S. History after 1965 summer school class at Monroe Community College the second half of that saying. It was "If we don't learn from our mistakes."

     Once again the United States of America is at a similar crossroads. It was a crossroads that we as a nation were at fourteen years ago this month. Our national security, intelligence and law enforcement agencies as well as other parties failed to connect the dots back in 2001. Now fourteen years later in 2015 we are at a similar juncture. Do we connect the dots this time or will be subjected to another 9/11esque attack, but one that could be much more devastating in loss of life and other damages? In my debut novel "Black Friday" the mantra "History repeats itself time and time again unless we learn from our mistakes" was a prevailing theme. If you wish to know either follow the excerpts on this blogsite or buy the novel. If we are to prevent another actual September 11th caliber or worse attack, then we must learn from our past mistakes.

Americans, the choice is ours. Do we allow history to repeat itself or do we learn from our mistakes and prevent another devastating/catastrophic terrorist attack from ever occurring?

Tom